UPDATE – ALEX BALDWIN COMPLETES THE KILL – LADY HAS THE WRONG NUMBER

Alec Baldwin’s scuffle with anti-Israel agitator ‘Crackhead Barney’ spilled onto sidewalk outside NYC coffee shop, photos show

By Social Links forAlex Oliveira
Published April 23, 2024
Updated April 23, 2024, 5:14 p.m. ETBaldwin appeared to have snatched Crackhead Barney's phone out of her hands before leaving

Alec Baldwin’s scuffle with a loudmouthed anti-Israel agitator at a New York City coffee shop spilled out onto the sidewalk, new photos obtained by The Post show.

An irate Baldwin, 66, was seen struggling with the woman out the front door and down the stoop of Maman, an upscale cafe on University Place in Greenwich Village, after she had accosted him inside on Monday and demanded he declare “Free Palestine” as she filmed him.

Footage of the encounter, first posted online by the woman herself, cut off after Baldwin took a swipe at her phone — and new photos appear to show him snatching the phone from her hand and using it to drive her out of the coffee shop.

Crackhead Barney and Alec Baldwin scuffle over her phone outside the coffee shop Monday
The scene from outside Maman appeared to show the Emmy winner holding the woman’s phone out of her reach as she scrabbled up his arms after it.

“Alec, can you please say ‘Free Palestine’ one time?” she asked him several times, before promising to leave him alone if he’ll just say it once.

As he headed for the door shaking his head, she added ““F–k Israel, f–k Zionism.”

“Why did you kill that lady? You killed that lady and got no jail time,” she said at one point, referring to the death of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins, who was killed on the set of Baldwin’s movie “Rust” when a prop gun he was shooting wound up loaded with a live bullet.Baldwin appeared to keep Crackhead Barney's phone away as he tried to make her leave

They struggled down the stairs before the woman eventually got her hands on the device.Crackhead Barney and Alec Baldwin scuffle over her phone outside the coffee shop Monday

U.N. AN ARM OF HAMAS

UN fails to black list Hamas for rape, Israel condemns decision while US is silent United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres waits for the arrival of French Foreign and European Affairs Minister Stephane Sejourne before a meeting of the United Nations Security Council on the crisis in the Gaza Strip at U.N. headquarters in New York, U.S., January 23, 2024.  (photo credit: REUTERS/EDUARDO MUNOZ)

Hamas does not appear on the black list of groups who are suspected of having committed sexual violence during a conflict, the Foreign Ministry said.

HAMAS INTERESTED ONLY IN KILLING JEWS – STARVES THEIR OWN PEOPLE

The Jerusalem Post Logo - Bring them home nowHamas kills aid workers to manufacture Gaza food crisis, Fatah charges

A Fatah TV anchor reported that Hamas had attacked aid workers, stolen food and water and caused food prices to skyrocket in the Gaza Strip.

Humanitarian aid falls through the sky towards the Gaza Strip after being dropped from an aircraft, amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Islamist group Hamas, as seen from Israel, March 29, 2024. (photo credit: AMIR COHEN/REUTERS)

(photo credit: AMIR COHEN/REUTERS)

https://youtu.be/v8DXonswjyg
The Palestinian political faction Fatah charged on air that Hamas had deliberately killed aid workers, stolen aid and manufactured a food crisis in Gaza, according to a Palestinian Media Watch (PMW) investigation published on Sunday.

A Fatah TV anchor reported that Hamas had attacked aid workers, stolen food and water and caused food prices to skyrocket in the Gaza Strip – which PMW said constituted a triple crime.

“Hamas’ persecution of any party who is a source for distributing the [humanitarian] aid or securing it began from the start of the war, as Hamas persecuted well-known figures and teams of volunteers on the ground in mid-October [2023],” the anchor said. ”It attacked them and killed some of them for two reasons: Firstly, to prevent any activity by any [other] party in the Gaza Strip; and secondly, to ensure Hamas control over the aid and its storage, which of course leads to these crazy and unreal prices that no one can pay in the shadow of this destruction.

“After the occupation bombed storehouses controlled by Hamas, the accumulation of tons of various food and aid products that Hamas had taken exclusivity over became clear, at a time when the Gaza Strip is suffering from hunger.”

Palestinian civilians complained to the IDF that Hamas stole aid, The Jerusalem Post reported in January, alongside recordings of civilian testimonies.

In one recorded call, a Gazan civilian testified that Hamas murdered his cousin because he tried to seek help from UNRWA. In another conversation, a civilian said he does not leave his home because he fears Hamas will seize it and use the property to fire toward Israel and destroy his house.

RUST ACTOR TAKES ACTION – SWATS ANTAGONIZERS PHONE

US NEWS

Alec Baldwin smacks phone of anti-Israel agitator who demanded he say ‘Free Palestine’ in coffee shop

SHAFIK FORCED TO TAKE ACTION

Columbia University president takes drastic action as antisemitic mobs rage unchecked

ERDOGAN SENDS ANOTHER MAVI MARMARA TO ISRAEL – THE MIDDLE EAST TROUBLE MAKER

Türkiye sends 9th aid ship to Gaza, consolidating role as top relief supplier: President Erdogan (ALWAYS LOOKING FOR TROUBLE)

Türkiye has allowed no exports to Israel that can be used for military purposes long before Israel’s current Gaza offensive, says Recep Tayyip Erdogan

Dilara Hamit and Gozde Bayar  |16.04.2024 – Update : 17.04.2024

ANKARA

Türkiye maintains its role as a leading provider of humanitarian aid to Gaza, the country’s president said Tuesday, pointing to the dispatch of its ninth vessel carrying 3,774 tons of relief materials to the Palestinian enclave.

Speaking after a Cabinet meeting in the capital Ankara, Recep Tayyip Erdogan emphasized that Türkiye had been allowing no exports to Israel that could be used for military purposes long before the current military offensive on Gaza began in October last year.

Türkiye is the country that pioneered the export restriction against Israel after Tel Aviv launched its attacks on the Gaza Strip last October, he added.

The Turkish president added that apart from a few countries, nobody reacted to the Israeli administration’s “brutality,” which trampled on international practices.

Erdogan highlighted Türkiye’s role as a stable actor amidst global turmoil, attributing this to its balanced foreign policy and achievements in the defense industry.

First of all, Turkey is not a stable actor, they buy missiles and defense weapons from Russia, side stepping the United States and its allies. Another words, Turkey has spit in the face of NATO. Turkey is a trouble maker, anti Christian and anti Jew.

Then he goes on saying few countries, nobody reacted to the Israeli administration’s “brutality. What a joke, no mention of Hamas killing, raping and murdering 1200 Jews. Remember, that the virulent septic tank minds of the Islamist will never stop their attack on Jews, it is imbedded into their Jurassic heads at an early age. 

Gaza aid flotilla plans to challenge Israeli blockade, organizers say

 and 

Beril Eski
April 21, 2024 at 3:00 a.m. EDT

ISTANBUL — A flotilla of ships bound for the Gaza Strip is preparing to sail from Turkey in the coming days, organizers say, on a mission aimed at breaching Israel’s naval blockade and highlighting the lack of aid reaching Palestinians in the besieged enclave.

The organizers, gathered under the banner of the Freedom Flotilla Coalition, have participated in similar missions for years, an effort that gained worldwide attention in 2010 after an Israeli raid on a flotilla that included a Turkish ship, the Mavi Marmara, killed 10 people and sparked a diplomatic crisis between Turkey and Israel.

But the flotilla’s well-traveled route — the Mediterranean — has gained new relevance during the current conflict as governments and relief organizations alike turn to sea deliveries to circumvent what aid groups say is Israel’s persistent obstruction of deliveries to Gaza over land.

OBAMA’S BEER HALL PUTSCH AT COLUMBIA

Don’t ever think that Barak Hussein Obama is not pushing this charade at Columbia. Obama is the original Nazi perpetrator by selling Israel down the drain. In Obama’s own words, “let me be clear on this.” Hussein who was the recipient of a Nobel Peace Prize, yet stands idly by as his Columbia is the scene of anti Semites threating the lives of Jews, forcing them from campus or face death. He is not a man of peace, but a rabble rouser, with Jew Hate in his heart. The Muslim in him resides like a soldier doing the killing for Muhammad. 

But you must not forget that evil president of Columbia, a Muslim traitor to America; Shafik is fanning the flames of Jew Hate by not shutting down the protesting anti Semitic miscreants. These protests need to be stopped once and for all.

President Biden, another lightweight in a ring of heavyweights, sits idly by condoning the Jew Hate by not bringing in the National Guard. Demands for Shafik, that she step down are increasing by the minute. And don’t forget that General Dwight Eisenhower was also a president of Columbia. The General and ex-President was a man of integrity who would never allowed such hate on the campus of George II. 

 

The Beer Hall Putsch was a failed coup d’état by Nazi Party leader Adolf Hitler and General Erich Ludendorff in Munich, Germany, on 8–9 November 1923They tried to overthrow the Bavarian government and start a national revolution against the Weimar RepublicThey stormed into a beer hall where the three men that governed Bavaria were meeting and attempted to force them to join their causeThe coup was quickly suppressed by the police and the army.

The grilling of Shafik by Elise Stefanik, N.Y Congresswoman fron the 21st District. She takes no prisoners, this Lady is tough. Trump needs her as V.P.

Elise Stefink questions Columbia Jew Hating president.

Read a full transcript of her line of questioning below:

Congresswoman Stefanik: I want to follow up on my colleague Rep. Walberg’s question regarding Professor Joseph Massad. So let me be clear, President, that he was spoken to. Who spoke with him?

President Shafik: He was spoken to by his Head of Department and his Dean. 

Congresswoman Stefanik: And what was he told?

President Shafik: I was not in those conversations. I think he was told that that language was unacceptable.

Congresswoman Stefanik: But you’re not aware of what he was told? What was he told?

President Shafik: That that language was unacceptable.

Congresswoman Stefanik: And were there any other enforcement actions taken? Any other disciplinary actions taken? 

President Shafik: In his case, he has not repeated anything like that ever since. 

Congresswoman Stefanik: Does he need to repeat stating that the massacre of Israeli civilians was ‘awesome’? Does he need to repeat his participation in an unauthorized, pro-Hamas demonstration on April 4th? You know, Professor David Schizer talked about the lack of enforcement. Do you agree that this is an issue with a lack of enforcement when the policy of Columbia specifically stated on April 5th said, ‘I want to make clear that it is absolutely unacceptable for any member of this community to promote the use of terror or violence,’ and yet you have no action? No disciplinary action. Do you agree with how the university has handled this? 

President Shafik: Yeah, we have 4,700 faculty at Columbia, most of whom spend all of their time dedicated to teaching their students

Congresswoman Stefanik: But I’m talking about the faculty members who are supporting terror and it’s not just that case. Let me bring your attention to Mohamed Abdou who was hired after the October 7th terrorist attack against Israel. He, on October 11th, posted: ‘Yes, I’m with Hamas and Hezbollah and Islamic Jihad.’ He also decried false reports accusing Arabs and Muslims of decapitating the heads of children and being rapists. We know that there were decapitations of babies, of innocent Israeli citizens, of seniors, of women, there were rapes and yet Columbia hired this individual as a professor. How did that hiring process work? Were you aware of those statements before the hiring?

President Shafik: I share with you your repugnance at those remarks. I completely understand that. On my watch, faculty who make remarks that cross the line in terms of antisemitism, there will be consequences for them.

Congresswoman Stefanik: What are the consequences in this case? 

President Shafik: I have five cases at the moment who have either been either taken out of the classroom or dismissed. 

Congresswoman Stefanik: And is he one of those? 

President Shafik: He will never work at Columbia again.

Congresswoman Stefanik: So he has been terminated?

President Shafik: He has been terminated and not just terminated, but his files will show that he will never work at Columbia again. 

Congresswoman Stefanik: So he is currently not employed by Columbia?

President Shafik: He is grading his students’ papers and will never teach at Columbia again and that will be on his permanent record.

Congresswoman Stefanik: How are you changing the hiring processes? Because on your watch, he was hired after he made these statements publicly? How are you ensuring this does not happen with your hiring process going forward?

President Shafik: So when we hire people, obviously they have to meet the academic qualifications, but we do an employment check and a criminal record check. We also ask everyone to do an attestation that they have never been accused of discrimination or part of an investigation around harassment or discrimination. And that attestation has to be signed by all new employees. 

Congresswoman Stefanik: And it didn’t work in this case. 

President Shafik: I think in this case, while he may not have been subject to an investigation on discrimination or found guilty, it has to be found guilty. 

Congresswoman Stefanik: But don’t you think it’s a problem when the hiring process of Columbia is hiring someone who makes those statements, and is hiring them after making those statements?

President Shafik: I agree with you that I think we need to look at how to toughen up those requirements. We do have a requirement, but I agree with you. I think we need to look at how we can make it more effective. 

Congresswoman Stefanik: Let me ask about Professor Katherine Frank from the Columbia Law School who said that ‘all Israeli students who have served in the IDF are dangerous and shouldn’t be on campus.’ What disciplinary action has been taken against that professor?’

President Shafik: I agree with you that those comments are completely unacceptable and discriminatory.

Congresswoman Stefanik: But I’m asking you what disciplinary action has been taken.

President Shafik: She has been spoken to by very senior person in the 

WHY TRUMP WILL SAVE AMERICA – THE ISLAMIZATION OF AMERICA MUST BE STOPPED – LOOK AT EUROPE – ITS GONE

Martin Sellner, Remigration: Ein Vorschlag (Remigration: A Proposal), Verlag Antaios, 2024, €20, 184 pages (available only in German)

In March, Austrian identitarian leader Martin Sellner was banned from Germany for three years. The same month, he gave a talk in the Swiss canton of Aargau when police barged in and handcuffed him. He was deported and banned from the canton also for three years. The justification for the bans in both countries was his dangerous ideas on “remigration,” which he explains in this book: a short, accessible, and admirably thorough treatment of one of the most important problems of our time.
February 23, 2024, Saxony, Chemnitz: A participant at a rally holds a sign reading ”Martin Sellner is welcome.” Sellner, a right-wing activist from Austria, was speaking at a demonstration organized by the Identitarian Movement. (Credit Image: © Sebastian Willnow/dpa via ZUMA Press)
Posted on April 19, 2024

Remigration: The Identitarian Solution

John Jackson, American Renaissance, April 19, 2024

Credit Image: © Ying Tang/NurPhoto via ZUMA Press


Subscribe to future audio versions of AmRen articles here.

Martin Sellner, Remigration: Ein Vorschlag (Remigration: A Proposal), Verlag Antaios, 2024, €20, 184 pages (available only in German)

In March, Austrian identitarian leader Martin Sellner was banned from Germany for three years. The same month, he gave a talk in the Swiss canton of Aargau when police barged in and handcuffed him. He was deported and banned from the canton also for three years. The justification for the bans in both countries was his dangerous ideas on “remigration,” which he explains in this book: a short, accessible, and admirably thorough treatment of one of the most important problems of our time.

February 23, 2024, Saxony, Chemnitz: A participant at a rally holds a sign reading ”Martin Sellner is welcome.” Sellner, a right-wing activist from Austria, was speaking at a demonstration organized by the Identitarian Movement. (Credit Image: © Sebastian Willnow/dpa via ZUMA Press)

The author calls the immigration to most Western nations “replacement migration.” The term comes from a 2000 UN policy paper, but the process began decades earlier. As Mr. Sellner puts it, “since the 1970s, population growth in Western Europe can be almost exclusively attributed to immigrants and their birth rates.”

After the Baby Boomers, each generation of native Germans, for example, has been smaller than the one before, while each generation of migrants has been larger. Mr. Sellner includes graphs from the Federal Statistical Office of Germany showing that “asylum seekers” are primarily men under the age of 40, while the median age of the native population is about 60. Some immigrants are pleased. Behzad Karim Khani, an Iranian, writes that “You are dying out, and . . . we migrants will surely inherit this country.”

Not only do immigrants have an advantage in youth and fertility, many have become citizens and can vote. Mr. Sellner estimates that there are 5 million “Germans” of non-European origin, of which 3 million are Muslims. They tend to support politicians who promise more immigration. Germans could therefore become a minority and, as Mr. Sellner notes, “lose the right of self-determination in their own country.”

Although economics are widely used to justify mass immigration, Mr. Sellner argues that moral convictions play a larger role. The Western world now belongs to a “cult of guilt” that teaches us to remember our collective sins and constantly do penance for them. In Germany, the most important aspect of this is universal “Holocaust education,” to the point that the national identity is now based on “deep historical shame.” Replacement migration is often explicitly justified as “atonement.” If it harms the native population, so much the better.

The most immediately obvious damage includes higher crime rates, Islamic terrorism, and the strain on public services. No fewer than 2.6 million non-citizens get unemployment benefits. Mr. Sellner argues that it is becoming socially acceptable to criticize these consequences of immigration, but not their cause. Diversity means not only more crime, but many other consequences of low trust: corruption, welfare fraud, loss of faith in democratic institutions, and lack of identity within the broader society. Europeans are losing their high-trust societies to migration.

Mr. Sellner writes that immigration should not be atonement, but should benefit Germans. It should reduce Überfremdung — the feeling of being overwhelmed by foreigners in one’s own country — and support German culture. Some immigration could be allowed, but much less, and with high standards. Foreigners’ desires for a better life are understandable, but do not outweigh the interests of Germans.

Mr. Sellner draws a distinction between integration and assimilation. Those who are integrated have jobs, obey the law, and speak German, but do not necessarily identify as German. Those who are assimilated think of themselves as Germans, and most of their friends are no longer from the home country. An immigrant is not truly assimilated until natives see him as one of their own. Some integrated but unassimilated immigrants can be tolerated.

In Mr. Sellner’s view, the truly assimilated could become citizens, but only at the end of a demanding “assimilation course.” They would have to demonstrate excellent knowledge of German language and culture, an above-average contribution to the economy, and show no signs of extremism. Only those who had lived in the country for 15 years without interruption (seven years for white immigrants) could become citizens. Finally, they would take an oath of loyalty to Germany, its people, and its constitution. Even those who have been naturalized could have citizenship revoked if, for example, they joined extremist groups.

Of least concern are white immigrants, who are usually integrated, if not always assimilated. They account for at least 6 million citizens, and at least 6 million more non-citizens. Culturally, they are relatively close to Germans. They vote differently from natives only in that they are somewhat more likely to support the AfD. Most have low crime rates, their birth rates are like those of Germans, and they do not burden public services. They do not start chain migration, because they do not have many poor relatives in their home countries, and those countries are safe. Even with no change in policy, Mr. Sellner would expect their numbers to decrease due to easy assimilation, low birth rates, and voluntary remigration.

"Where Revolution is the Solution" Taking back the Empire